02-02-2011, 10:44 AM
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikie
The problem is, the DNR jumped the gun and pulled the net BEFORE they caught the culprits fishing it. At this point in time, they have no case. They should have waited and then confiscated the boat and trucks used to transport the catch, and put the thieves in jail with BUBBA for awhile. Another screw up.
|
If you bothered to read the whole story(see Crabby & Son post above) or http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/o...,4455242.story and not just an abbreviated post on the internet you would understand that they did attempt to catch the poacher by staking out the area overnight. After that they acted in the best interest of the resource. The problem is not DNR jumping the gun.
Last edited by JOC71; 02-02-2011 at 10:58 AM.
|
02-02-2011, 11:31 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 1,430
|
|
Second net with similar catch and similar length pulled:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/o...,4455242.story
I confirmed it is not just a rerun of the initial story. This is a second bust.
|
02-02-2011, 12:08 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,114
|
|
Wanna know who set the nets - a criminal - plain and simple. Whether a rec or comm.
Poacher is not a strong enough word.
Whom ever it was is a thief - stealing from the honest comm and recs.
Reds - I do not see a group setting the net. Yes , they could gain some media coverage but think of the fall out if they were caught. Something that sneaky would likely shut a group down. Seems to me - far more to lose then to gain.
Plus - not likely a lot would change from it - we all know how things are ran at DNR.
Real thing to focus on would be to catch these criminals and demand a very harsh sentence.
|
02-02-2011, 12:23 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 110
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOC71
If you bothered to read the whole story(see Crabby & Son post above) or http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/o...,4455242.story and not just an abbreviated post on the internet you would understand that they did attempt to catch the poacher by staking out the area overnight. After that they acted in the best interest of the resource. The problem is not DNR jumping the gun.
|
I DID read the whole story. Staking out the net for one night wasn't long enough. They should have stayed with it until they caught the perps. Whatever fish that would have been lost would be well worth it, if it amounted to catching the bad guys and getting a conviction. After all, they spent YEARS catching the guys operating in D.C..
|
02-02-2011, 12:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mt. Airy, MD
Posts: 483
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikie
I DID read the whole story. Staking out the net for one night wasn't long enough. They should have stayed with it until they caught the perps. Whatever fish that would have been lost would be well worth it, if it amounted to catching the bad guys and getting a conviction. After all, they spent YEARS catching the guys operating in D.C..
|
Those rock fish spent MANY more years growing than any previous investigation lasted. The main job of the DNR is to protect the natural Resources and that is what they did. These fish are living creatures. Do you let all of them die waiting for a poacher that might show up? Whatever NRP does, it is not going to please everybody. When a fireman goes to a fire, they save the people first and then try to save the structure...................Gary
Last edited by crabby and son; 02-02-2011 at 12:45 PM.
|
02-02-2011, 01:57 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Linthicum,Md
Posts: 2,983
|
|
Looks like I need to send Marty Gary (DNR) a proposal on a piece of "white paper" to open PSCR back up without restrictions .
5th (Marty)
__________________
|
02-02-2011, 02:15 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 1,430
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikie
I DID read the whole story. Staking out the net for one night wasn't long enough. They should have stayed with it until they caught the perps. Whatever fish that would have been lost would be well worth it, if it amounted to catching the bad guys and getting a conviction. After all, they spent YEARS catching the guys operating in D.C..
|
I tend to agree with this. I believe catching the people would have probably saved more fish in the long run. But hey, DNR made their call and possibly the fact that most convictions lead to a slap on the wrist played a part in it too.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
New Forum Posts
CBA Event
Calendar Advertise on CBA
Log Out
Local Charter
Boats
Upcoming Tournaments
|